international Standards

A Comparative Overview of global Building Biology Standards
See Standards Comparison

Building Biology Standards

In an era where sustainable construction and healthy living environments are increasingly prioritized, understanding international building biology standards is more important than ever. These standards not only offer a framework for designing safe and comfortable buildings, but they also support the urgent need for sustainability in today’s built environment.

Moreover, they help address the growing challenges of climate change, rapid urbanization, and health issues linked to poor indoor air quality. As a result, architects, developers, and investors can use these standards as trusted benchmarks for best practices.

In the following sections, we explore several key international building biology standards. Specifically, we highlight their origins, main focus areas, and their role in promoting healthier, more sustainable living and working spaces.

SBM (Standard of Building Biology Measurement)

Originating in Germany in 1999, the SBM is a well-established standard in building biology. It sets strict limits for electromagnetic fields (electrosmog), mold, toxins, and radiation in living spaces. Although it is not legally binding, it forms the foundation for many international projects, especially those focused on creating healthy buildings. Notably, the latest revision — SBM 2024 — incorporates cutting-edge scientific findings to support the healthiest possible environments.

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)

Developed by the US Green Building Council in 1998, LEED is a widely recognized certification system promoting sustainability in over 165 countries. In many cases, LEED certification is a prerequisite for public building projects and eligibility for green loans. Moreover, it covers energy efficiency, air quality, water conservation, and more, following standards like ASHRAE 62.1 for indoor air quality.

WELL Building Standard (Building Biology Standards)

Introduced in 2014, the WELL Building Standard focuses primarily on the well-being of building occupants. As a result, it has become essential in health-centered building design. In fact, WELL is mandatory in some US states and plays a pivotal role in securing green financing. It evaluates factors such as indoor air quality, lighting, and materials — all aimed at enhancing health and comfort.

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method)

As one of the earliest sustainability standards, BREEAM was launched in the UK in 1990 and has gained global recognition. Particularly in Europe, BREEAM is often required for public building projects and used to secure financial incentives or loans. It places emphasis on energy efficiency and the reduction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), among other criteria.

MINERGIE (Building Biology Standards)

Originating from Switzerland in 1998, MINERGIE is a national standard that is legally required for many construction projects. Although it is most prominent in Switzerland, the standard is gaining traction in other countries, including Portugal. It focuses on energy efficiency and indoor air quality, with clear limits on consumption and emissions.

Cradle to Cradle Certified™ (Building Biology Standard)

In contrast to other standards, Cradle to Cradle centers on material recyclability and the reduction of toxicity. Since its launch in 2005, it has become increasingly relevant in the context of the circular economy. While not mandatory, Cradle to Cradle certification is becoming a preferred choice in innovative and sustainable architecture.

EN 13779 (European Standard for Indoor Air Quality)

Established in 2007, this standard applies to public buildings throughout the European Union, including Portugal. Specifically, EN 13779 defines permissible levels of CO₂ and particulate matter. Its main goal is to ensure healthy and safe indoor air, particularly in buildings with high occupancy rates.

Overview of International Building Biology Standards

A Comparative Analysis of Established Standards for Healthy and Sustainable Building Practices

Standard/Organization Since Spread Legal Relevance Limits/Features Link
SBM (Standard of Building Biology Measurement) 1999 Germany, globally Not legally binding, but foundational for many projects Electrosmog: <10 nT; Mold spores: <500 CFU/m³ Building Biology SBM Standard
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) 1998 USA, globally Relevant for public projects and green loans Energy efficiency, air quality, water savings; ASHRAE 62.1 LEED Certification
WELL Building Standard 2014 USA, globally Mandatory in certain US states, relevant for green financing Air quality: VOC limits, lighting: 3000 K max WELL Standard
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) 1990 UK, globally Required for public projects in several countries VOC limits: <300 µg/m³, energy efficiency ratings BREEAM Certification
MINERGIE 1998 Switzerland, Portugal Legally mandatory for new builds in Switzerland Max. energy consumption: 38 kWh/m², air quality MINERGIE
Cradle to Cradle Certified™ 2005 USA, internationally No legal obligation, but increasingly relevant Recyclability, 0% toxic substances Cradle to Cradle
EN 13779 (European Standard for Indoor Air Quality) 2007 EU countries, including Portugal Legally required for public buildings in the EU CO₂ limit: <1000 ppm, fine dust: <50 µg/m³ EN 13779

Timeline of Building Biology Standards Evolution

Key Milestones in the Development of International Standards for Healthy Construction Practices

1990

BREEAM

Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method - UK, globally

1998

MINERGIE

Switzerland, Portugal

1998

LEED

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design - USA, globally

1999

SBM

Standard of Building Biology Measurement - Germany, globally

2005

Cradle to Cradle Certified™

USA, internationally

2007

EN 13779

European Standard for Indoor Air Quality - EU countries, including Portugal

Summary

A Conclusion on the Long-standing Commitment to Ecological and Healthy Building Practices

Ecological and healthy building practices are not a recent phenomenon; in fact, they have been promoted for over 30 years by a variety of standards and organizations. Over time, the push for sustainable construction has gained momentum, highlighting the importance of creating environments that prioritize occupant health and well-being. At Mezzalyn, we fully recognize the significance of adhering to established limits for indoor air quality. Therefore, our assessments and certifications are designed to provide residents with peace of mind regarding their living conditions.

Building Biology Standards

By following rigorous building biology standards, such as the SBM and EN 13779, we can confidently assure that the buildings we evaluate meet the highest benchmarks for healthy living environments. Moreover, our commitment to ecological building practices is not merely about compliance with regulations. Rather, it reflects a deeper responsibility to promote sustainability and public health across the construction industry. As a result, we strive to foster a culture of awareness and accountability in every project we support. Consequently, the spaces we help create are not only environmentally conscious, but also enhance the quality of life for those who inhabit them. Together, we can lead the way toward a healthier and more sustainable built environment.

Ready to Create a Healthier Living Environment?

If you’re interested in transforming your building projects into healthy and sustainable spaces, don’t hesitate to reach out. Fill out the form below to get in touch with our team at Mezzalyn and learn how we can help you ensure compliance with international building biology standards.